Judgemental - a psychologist and a lawyer walk into a bar

When idiosyncratic is deemed unreasonable – a discussion on beliefs, bullying and organisational justice

Episode Summary

In the final episode of Series 2, Kate and Greg settle into their metaphorical bar stools with cocktails in hand to unpack a recent Fair Work Commission decision that, while legally unremarkable, opens up a typically rich and thought provoking conversation.

Episode Notes

In the final episode of Series 2, Kate and Greg settle into their metaphorical bar stools with cocktails in hand to unpack a recent Fair Work Commission decision that, while legally unremarkable, opens up a typically rich and thought provoking conversation.

The case involves a worker placed on a performance management plan, who later lodged an anti-bullying application. Though the Commission found no bullying, it did note the applicant’s “idiosyncratic personalised belief system” – prompting Kate & Greg to consider the limited number of circumstances where such phrasing isn’t open to appeal.    

As always, the episode is equal parts sharp analysis and warm banter with both Kate and Greg naming their favourite conversations from Series 2. Which was yours?

 

Connect with us:

 

Articles:

 

Resources:

 


Follow Judgemental: A psychologist and a lawyer walk into a bar

Be sure to subscribe, leave us a review or send us a message.